Meraki Networks' plan to cover San Francisco with free Wi-Fi, with residents'
help, could be a way around the political and business barriers some municipal
wireless projects have run into.

The startup, partly funded by Google,
believes it will succeed where EarthLink and Google did not: Building Wi-Fi
access throughout San Francisco at no cost to the city. It expects to finish
by year's end, filling the whole city with 1M bps (bit per second) coverage.

The catch is that Meraki is
footing the whole bill on this project so it can learn how to roll out such
networks for profit elsewhere. The good news, if the plan works, is that it
could do so for less than US$5 million, lower than the cost many other municipal
wireless projects have run into. That's partly because of intelligence in access
points and software, making the network more robust with fewer nodes, according
to Meraki spokeswoman Erika Shaffer.

Meraki will build the backbone of its network with solar-powered rooftop access
points and fill out its coverage with smaller repeaters to sit in windows or
on balconies. Both will be designed and built by Meraki and provided free to
residents and businesses that agree to house the gear on their property in return
for better coverage. All the nodes will be meshed, so Meraki won't have to get
wired broadband links everywhere its access points go.

The idea has potential in developing countries with little broadband, where
Meraki sees its biggest market, but also in highly wired cities such as San
Francisco, analysts said.

A key advantage is that by asking users instead of the city for mounting rights
for its gear, Meraki will bypass the rancorous political fights over contract
terms like the one that slowed down EarthLink's initiative last year. But seeking
volunteers also makes sure that however fully Meraki has actually covered the
city by the end of the year, it is pretty sure to have coverage where people
actually want it.

"You know exactly where your coverage needs to be, because someone just
asked you for a repeater," said IDC analyst Godfrey Chua.

Meraki believes it won't have any trouble getting people to host repeaters
in their homes, based on its existing test networks in parts of San Francisco,
Shaffer said. There are about 500 repeaters today, and about 40,000 people have
used the network, she said.

Another problem that would seem to solve itself, assuming the network and distribution
system run smoothly, is the difficult issue of indoor coverage, said Craig Settles,
an independent municipal network analyst at Successful.com. EarthLink's network
was to be built largely on streetlights and electricity poles, which are well
suited to mobile outdoor coverage, but not so good for providing home broadband
to residents who can't afford wired alternatives, Settles said. Meraki's small
repeaters are designed for indoor coverage in the home where they're located
as well as to flesh out the whole network.

On the San Francisco network, which Meraki will treat as a research and development
cost, the company will test advertising as a possible revenue source for future
deployments. When it approaches service providers that want to charge for access,
it will also offer a billing system. Meraki has trials going on today with carriers
in developing countries, Shaffer said.

In places where most people don't yet have broadband, Meraki's approach could
be an attractive low-cost alternative, analysts said. However, WiMax, which
requires far fewer base stations than Wi-Fi because it has a longer range, also
has relatively low costs and is already a competitor in those markets, Chua
said.

"I doubt that Wi-Fi would be the dominant access medium in emerging markets,"
Chua said.

IDG News Service

• Email
• Print
• Share
  • Slashdot
  • Digg
  • Stumble
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine