Google needs telco partner for 700MHz bid, say analysts
Google is making the necessary preparations to bid for wireless spectrum in
an auction be held in the U.S. in January -- but it will likely need a carrier
partner to help build a network to use it, analysts said Friday.
The spectrum, between 698MHz and 806MHz, and collectively called the 700MHz
band, is currently used for analog TV broadcasts. It is due to be freed up for
other uses, such as operating mobile telecommunications networks, by 2009. The
U.S. Federal Communications Commission plans to auction off the right to use
that spectrum on Jan. 24, and bidders must declare their intention to participate
by Dec. 3.
In July, Google said it would commit a minimum of US$4.6 billion to bid for
a license to use the spectrum, if the FCC set certain conditions on the licenses.
Those conditions included giving people the freedom to choose what applications
and networks they use with the phones they bought, and giving service providers
the freedom to connect with those networks and buy wholesale minutes from network
owners on reasonable terms.
Google is still making "the necessary preparations" for a bid, a
company representative said Friday.
The company is planning to finance that bid alone, without partners, according
to a report in The Wall Street Journal.
Laying out that kind of money for spectrum -- and even paying for the construction
of a wireless network to use it -- would present no great problem to Google,
which, as of Sept. 30, had $13.1 billion in cash and cash equivalents on hand.
But analysts are skeptical of the benefit to Google of going it alone.
"Wireless spectrum and network management are nowhere near Google's core
competency. Its competence is in one market, online advertising," said
Emma Mohr McClune, principal analyst with Current Analysis.
That sentiment was echoed by Jan Dawson, a vice president at market analyst
Ovum Ltd.
"Anything other than search at the minute seems like a move in the wrong
direction," said Dawson. With its focus on search-based advertising, Google's
financial metrics are "phenomenally better" than those that even the
best mobile network operators can achieve, he said. "You have to wonder
why a company would diversify into a market like that."
Google's goal may not be to make money from operating the network, though:
it could simply be a lever to get its applications into the hands of more mobile
phone owners.
It has already taken steps in this direction, offering versions of its Web
applications for Apple's iPhone, and launching the Open Handset Alliance to
promote its Android open software stack for mobile devices.
"The commonality between all those moves is to get their services running
on mobile devices," said Adam Leach of Ovum.
Building a wireless network is too much for Google to attempt alone, say the
analysts: the company should seek partners as it has in the handset market.
A carrier partner "is essential to building out and running a network.
The core issue is the operations and maintenance of this new network. ... It
is not trivial to build and run a telecommunications company," said Bill
Ho, senior analyst at Current Analysis.
If Google is to partner with an operator it could choose Sprint, some analysts
suggested. The two have already agreed to partner on WiMax services.
Partnering with Google could also be an opportunity for an experienced operator
not yet present in the U.S. to enter that market, suggested Dawson. Possible
candidates include Orange, a subsidiary of France Télécom with
networks in France, Poland, Spain, and the U.K., or Japan's NTT DoCoMo.
The U.S. is not the only country with plans to auction off analog television
spectrum for new uses: The U.K. began withdrawing analog TV service this month,
and other European Union countries are set to follow suit.
But the likelihood of this opening the way for a new pan-European service to
rival GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) is remote: each country
has different licensing rules for the television spectrum, and the frequencies
used are not always the same from country to country.
"I can't see all these auctions collectively creating a new single market,"
said McClune.
IDG News Service
Symantec Backup Exec 12 and Backup Exec System Recovery 8 deliver industry leading Windows data protection and system recovery. Download this whitepaper to find out the top reasons to upgrade and how to get continuous data protection and complete system recovery.
Data and system loss — from a hard drive failure, malicious attack, natural disaster, or simple human error — can happen anytime. Don’t leave your business vulnerable. Make sure you have a secure recovery strategy in place. Symantec's latest backup and system recovery technology can efficiently restore critical applications, individual emails and documents and even restore your entire system in minutes in the event of a loss.
Businesses face a growing challenge to ensure that the IT environment is properly protected. Backup Exec 12 integrates with other applications in the Symantec family of products, to complement your current data protection strategy, keep your data securely backed up and make it recoverable when you need it most.
Enterprise 2.0 Implementation
By Aaron C. Newman, Jeremy Thomas
Published by McGraw-Hill
Learn more!
Deploying Cisco Wide Area Application Services
By Zach Seils, Joel Christner
Published by Cisco Press
Learn more!








